The role of the language learner within the language classroom

The only theory which to me seems powerful enough is the so-called interactionist position. In traditional language classrooms all learning content is pre-defined, simplified and graded.

Role of students in learning second language

Wie ist Fremdverstehen lehr- und lernbar? Wolff eds. One significant development is the amount of student input and decision-making that naturally occurs in the development of the unit. Some are language activities while others involve general knowledge development. Positive experiences in the classroom lead to an excellent attitude toward language and culture. Although this spiral approach is ideal in language learning, the teacher must be aware of the program objectives and ensure that the objectives are being met. Although the interactionist position comes forward with a number of proposals which can be of interest as part of an overall CLIL learning theory — I am thinking here especially of the concepts of input, comprehension and interaction — I believe that it cannot explain the content and language learning process as such. The final product and the reflection on the unit give the students a sense of completion and accomplishment. Language is learnt because meaning is constructed. Only interaction of a conversational type has been analysed in this research. Students who feel safe and secure are much more willing to practise a second language. In a secondary classroom, they say, learners are exposed to the language six to seven hours a week instead of three to four hours in a normal language classroom: they make use of the foreign language more frequently and thus internalise it more quickly and more deeply. It is hardly necessary to mention that research and experimentation are highly motivating and involving activities. They are characterised by a scientific orientation and are, therefore, richer and more complex than most content dealt with in ordinary language classrooms.

Some important concepts of constructivism 33It is understandable that I cannot deal with constructivism in any detail here: I will just pick out some issues which are related to the key features of CLIL and thus important for my arguments. Suffice it to say that the scant research which has already been done on CLIL has shown that both language and content subject learning benefit enormously from such a methodological set-up.

One significant development is the amount of student input and decision-making that naturally occurs in the development of the unit.

Role of a teacher in language development

Some are language activities while others involve general knowledge development. The perceptual stimuli which enter the processing space in a sensory mode sound waves, letters have to be transformed into something cognitive. In the process, students become interested in the topic and motivated to learn more about it. Students are becoming more active in their role as learners and are playing a major part in many aspects of the Core French class. In this way a framework for social interaction is provided which contributes, as I pointed out above, both to learning and to language learning. This is documented, for example, by research on migrant workers who have often spent long periods of time in another country without having acquired even a rudimentary knowledge of the other language. Social constructivists carry their argument even further; according to them only input in which the comprehender can get engaged or even involved in, can be processed and will, in the end, lead to a construction which he can make use of. Instead of actively directing and controlling all activities the teacher will aim to set up conditions for meaningful practice and then take on the role of a resource person. In Breidbach, S. As we all know, this is often the case in instructed language learning in school or university, where learners believe that in monotonously working through formal exercises they will learn language. Organization of Teaching Units Teaching units provide the framework for the delivery of the Core French program. Research and experimentation can also be carried out with language, of course, but a learning laboratory lends itself much more readily to investigation in social and natural sciences. The primary role of the teacher in a multidimensional language class is to establish conditions and develop activities so that students are able to practise the language in a meaningful context. Meeting with colleagues, formally or informally, also provides an opportunity for discussion, sharing and practising the language on another level. In Bredella, L.

Students are becoming more active in their role as learners and are playing a major part in many aspects of the Core French class. But the role of interaction is different from what the interactionist theory of SLA proposes.

importance of teaching english language pdf

The issues dealt with are human comprehension, interaction, input and learning.

Rated 5/10 based on 78 review
Download
Approaches to Instruction